Iran Tests Saudi, American Resolve in the Gulf of Aden

05.26.15

Iran Tests Saudi, American Resolve in the Gulf of Aden

05.26.15
Getty ImagesGetty Images

By Adam Taylor for Global Risk Insights

The interesting detail in the deployment of an Iranian humanitarian vessel to Yemen is not in its contents, but, rather, in how the ship planned to deliver the cargo – by sailing right in and offloading it.

While this doubtlessly would not play well in the mind of the young Saudi Minister of Defense, Mohammad bin Salman, who has been overseeing Riyadh’s naval and air blockade of Yemen since the end of March, it would have hardly been surprising given that Iran made a similar attempt last month, when it sailed a blockade-busting flotilla west through the Gulf of Aden.

While there has been a lot of bluster regarding the Saudi-Iranian ‘proxy war’ unfolding in Yemen, many analysts agree that the real reason for the conflict is not sectarian differences between regional powers, but tribal politics in the impoverished nation of Yemen. Saudi involvement, in turn, has roots in ensuring everything is in order in its turf to the south.

In this context, the recent collision course that Iran has twice set with the Saudi naval blockade is better regarded as a test of the boundaries of Saudi – and, by extension, American – power and resolve. These challenges are framed against the backdrop of Iran’s improving fortunes in the region, facilitated not least of all by a potential nuclear agreement with the United States.

Humanitarian missions serve dual purpose of strategy and propaganda

Not all challenges to Saudi suzerainty have been under the auspices of arming the Houthis. In the case of the Shahed vessel, the Iranians claimed from the start that the ship carried humanitarian cargo and then, after what turned out to be minor protests, agreed to dock in Djibouti, allowing UN inspectors on board and transferring its shipment for final delivery to the World Food Program.

While not breaking the Saudi blockade in the strictest sense, Iran’s delivery of humanitarian goods certainly undermined it, boisterously declaring for 90% of the trip that it intended to flout the blockade, only to skirt it on a technicality for the final 10% of the voyage.

Viewed in this light, the presence of the two-ship Iranian military escort for the Shahed seems less designed to protect cargo and more to antagonize Saudi Arabia’s leaders.

Nor is the Shahed the only attempt to undermine Saudi authority by means of humanitarian mission. After the failed flotilla last month (whether it was truly a failure is examined below), an Iranian plane allegedly carrying doctors and medicines tried landing in rebel-held Sana’a. The plane was intercepted by Saudi F-15s, and when the plane wouldn’t divert, the Saudis blew up the runway.

The same goes for the nine-ship flotilla that attempted to run the blockade in April, only to turn back after being shadowed by the US capital ship USS Theodore Roosevelt and its companion, the USS Normandy.

A risky approach

While Iranian leaders might have been able to deliver larger amounts of arms via ships, other means might have meant less attention and more success. The Sudan corridor is a well-known route for ferrying arms from Iran to Hamas in Gaza. Could Sudan not have been mobilized to quietly ferry arms across the Red Sea?

Also worth considering are the ships that plied their way between Iran and Yemen in the early part of the year.

As uncovered by the Financial Times, at least four ships made the trip after the Houthis took Sana’a, making significant attempts to disguise themselves in the process.

That the more recent Iranian attempts to get to Yemen took no similar precautions — in fact, they’re almost amateurish by comparison — suggests that supporting the Houthis for their own sake wasn’t the Iranians’ primary objective.

What’s certain is that, in the run-up to a potential nuclear agreement, Iran is seeing its position in the region improve. So it may be that, given the slow deterioration of the Saudi-US alliance, Iran wants to see how far the American defensive umbrella extends.

It’s also possible that Iran simply wants to project an image of itself as strong, stalwart and activist in the run-up to final nuclear negotiations. But the accepted wisdom that it was seeking to re-arm Yemeni rebels on ideological grounds is likely just a tactical smokescreen as Iran probes the limits of its adversary’s power and resolve.

4 comments
4 comments
ChangeIranNow
ChangeIranNow

Just another example of Iran not caring what the rest of the world thinks. Iran is already a known supplier of military aid to the Houthis. They started this whole civil war in the first place. They already tried a nine-ship military convoy that got turned around for not allowing inspections. Then they tried again last with this ship again with no inspections. If it's just humanitarian supplies, why not just go to the UN hub where there is infrastructure for distribution? It's Iran wanting to play by its own rules again, more interesting in staging a confrontation on the high seas instead of actually pulling out of Yemen and letting that country fix itself. Iran is like that guy who likes to kick sand at people on the beach just to prove how tough he is. Nothing more, Iran loves being the bully. What a self-esteem problem for those mullahs.

Parsa G
Parsa G

@ChangeIranNow Iran did not start this conflict, and the Houthis did not need their assistance in overthrowing the government. The Houthis and the Zaydi population had legitimate grievances against the rulers in their country long before Saudi Arabia's illegal intervention.

It's clear that Saudi Arabia, fearing the changing regional dynamics, and terrified of a U.S.-Iran nuclear deal, is trying desperately to hold on to an untenable regional status quo by flexing its muscles as often and as belligerently as it can.

Parsa G
Parsa G

@ChangeIranNow Iran did not start this conflict, and the Houthis did not need Iran's assistance in overthrowing the government. The Houthis and the Zaydi population had legitimate grievances against the rulers in their country long before Saudi Arabia's illegal intervention. It's clear that Saudi Arabia, fearing the changing regional dynamics, and terrified of a U.S.-Iran nuclear deal, is trying desperately to hold on to an untenable regional status quo by flexing its muscles as often and as belligerently as it can.

Parsa G
Parsa G

@ChangeIranNow Iran did not start this conflict, and the Houthis did not need Iran's assistance in overthrowing the government. The Houthis and the Zaydi population held legitimate grievances against the rulers in their country long before Saudi Arabia's illegal intervention. It's clear that Saudi Arabia, fearing the changing regional dynamics, and terrified of a U.S.-Iran nuclear deal, is trying desperately to hold on to an untenable regional status quo by flexing its muscles as often and as belligerently as it can.

  • via Facebook
    via Facebook

    Macedonia, the Melting Pot Boils Over

  • Reuters
    Reuters

    Obama’s ISIS Strategy Needs to Change

  • Raqqa Media Center
    Raqqa Media Center

    Erasing the Past: ISIS, Palmyra and Doomed History

  • Jonathan Snyder/USAF
    Jonathan Snyder/USAF

    U.S. Bombers to Australia: Washington’s Deployments in the Pacific

  • Reuters
    Reuters

    Curious Turnaround: The British Election 2015

  • New York Times
    New York Times

    Lies, Lies, and The Death of Bin Laden

  • Reuters
    Reuters

    Yemen Re-Draws Middle East Alliances

  • Associated Press
    Associated Press

    Violence in Kumanovo: Macedonia and the Virtues of Corruption

  • Reuters
    Reuters

    The Case for Castro: Why the Embargo Needs to End in 2015

    05.08.15