The Obama Recovery: America’s Wealth Declines

06.07.13

The Obama Recovery: America’s Wealth Declines

06.07.13
Kit Fox/MedillKit Fox/Medill

At a recent appearance in Austin, Texas, President Obama attempted to make the case that America was back in the swing of things and that the Obama Administration’s initiative for economic recovery was truly coming to fruition. “Terrific things are going on in communities all across America,” the President proclaimed, quickly adding in a swipe at Congressional inaction as the impediment for greater progress.

U.S. consumer confidence in May was at its highest in six years, stock market gains have been impressive, and there has been some uptick in U.S. home prices. But considering how far down these indicators had been and for how long, this comparatively rosy picture of economic conditions is far from something to jump for joy about. In fact, a new essay by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis’ new Center for Household Financial Stability paints a stark and analytically supported assessment that examines, “the circumstances that led to large declines in household wealth, make the case that such wealth has not fully recovered.”

Some of the major takeaways from the Federal Reserves report include: Average household wealth in real terms, contrary to recent headlines, has not fully recovered; indeed, it is only about halfway back to prerecession levels. While many Americans lost wealth because of the recession, younger, less-educated and/or African-American and Hispanic families lost the most, in percentage terms. Those subgroups had higher-than-average concentrations of their wealth in housing and higher debt-to-asset ratios than less economically vulnerable groups. The very families most exposed to the economic fallout of a deep recession—fallout that came in the form of job loss or reduced income—possessed the weakest and riskiest balance sheets.

Among the many stark revelations this report puts forth is the harsh realization that American household wealth declined by 55 percent since the Great Recession and it still has not rebounded, nor has it been evenly enjoyed by all economic income classes. As the report explains, “Of the total recovery of $14.7 trillion between the first quarter of 2009 and the fourth quarter of 2012, $9.1 trillion, or 62 percent, of the gain was due to higher stock-market wealth. Stock wealth is unevenly held, with the vast majority of stocks owned by a relatively small number of wealthy families.”

Perhaps even more profound is one of the report’s summative observations, “Considering the uneven recovery of wealth across households, a conclusion that the financial damage of the crisis and recession largely has been repaired is not justified.” Even the Federal Reserve is pouring cold water on part of the President’s stump speeches that boast of significant economic recovery. It’s worth repeating the observation: “a conclusion that the financial damage of the crisis and recession largely has been repaired is not justified.” That’s a pretty powerful, albeit dismal, dose of reality.

As a supposed champion of the middle class, one would imagine that the President would be doing more than simply chastising Congress for doing nothing. Yet the President seems resigned to hit the campaign trail, criticize an ineffectual Congress, and peddle a rosy picture of economic growth. Unfortunately, this picture is a decoration over a glaring hole, a penchant symbol for Presidential inaction, and the incarnation of dismissive partisan rhetoric, and it is painted in the absence of substantive facts as well as much needed Presidential leadership. Stump speeches and talking points that tout unrealized progress, especially when the truth is fare less genuine is simply better known as ‘fuzzy math with rose colored glasses.’

This article was originally posted in The Washington Times.

one comment
1 comments
Gregory H Bontrager
Gregory H Bontrager

With the re-election of Barack Obama, the United States has officially become a banana republic. From a nation that produced patriots like Ronald Reagan and John Kennedy, we have knowingly selected the lowest common denominator as our commander in chief.

From China to Iran, the enemies of freedom can now breathe a collective sigh of relief as the citizens of the United States have placed an empty suit at the helm of state. To think the American people would select Barack Obama over a man like Mitt Romney is a national embarrassment that we will not soon overcome.

Never in history has a nation so great fallen so far, so fast, as ours did on Nov. 6, 2012. Albert Einstein said, "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." Using this definition, anyone who expects anything different from Obama must surely be insane

  • Screengrab

    ISIS’ Growth Presents New Challenges for the Group

  • via Youtube

    Politics and Poets: Inspiring the EU to Act on Immigration

  • William Cho

    TFTA: Africa’s Crucial Inflection Point

  • Greg Webb

    The Nuclear Narrative

  • Reuters

    Libya: When an Agreement Isn’t

  • Screengrab

    The Almost Indomitable Islamic State

  • Reuters

    U.S.-Turkish War on ISIS: Disaster in the Making

  • Gijs Klooster/FAO

    Climate Change and Destabilization in the MENA Region